Message5500
Hi Tom:
In message
<1458580078.01.0.729648572724.issue2550803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> ,
Tom Ekberg writes:
>Having 3 settings sounds fine to me.
>
>As to In-Reply-To, I don't remember exactly why I did this. I think it was
>to indicate which tracker the email came from. That information is already
>present at to the bottom of the email, so it appears that setting In-Reply-
>To is not really necessary.
Also In-Reply-To should be the message id of the message being replied
to so emal client can thread properly. I would suggest not applying
that part of the patch.. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-03-21 21:25:54 | rouilj | set | recipients:
+ rouilj, admin, schlatterbeck, ber, pefu, tekberg |
2016-03-21 21:25:54 | rouilj | link | issue2550803 messages |
2016-03-21 21:25:54 | rouilj | create | |
|