Issue 2550982
Created on 2018-07-25 19:47 by joseph_myers, last changed 2018-08-02 23:24 by joseph_myers.
|
| msg6138 |
Author: [hidden] (joseph_myers) |
Date: 2018-07-25 19:47 |
|
We should prefer the standard library's PBKDF2 support in password
handling, over M2Crypto and our local code, when available (Python
2.7.8, 3.4 and later).
|
| msg6146 |
Author: [hidden] (cmeerw) |
Date: 2018-07-29 09:40 |
|
Here is a patch:
https://bitbucket.org/cmeerw/roundup/commits/4110b65235825062213dc295cd34
24b66f239139
Note that this removes M2Crypto support (not sure if we would still want
to keep that?)
BTW, there is a noticeable speedup when running the tests (compared to
the Python implementation).
|
| msg6157 |
Author: [hidden] (cmeerw) |
Date: 2018-08-02 06:26 |
|
pushed changes in 3d0f71775e42
As far as I can tell, Debian jessie (oldstable), Ubuntu 16.04 and RHEL
7.2 (backported) all support PBKDF2 in Python's hashlib. That probably
only leaves Ubuntu 14.04 (as a supported distribution) for using the
bundled implementation as a fallback.
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2018-08-02 23:24:09 | joseph_myers | set | status: new -> fixed |
| 2018-08-02 06:26:39 | cmeerw | set | assignee: cmeerw
resolution: fixed
messages:
+ msg6157 |
| 2018-07-29 09:40:03 | cmeerw | set | nosy:
+ cmeerw
messages:
+ msg6146 |
| 2018-07-25 19:47:57 | joseph_myers | create | |
|