Issue 790326
Created on 2003-08-18 02:01 by rouilj, last changed 2003-08-26 00:26 by richard.
msg914 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2003-08-18 02:01 |
|
The format of the url field in the query hyperdb item
changed in 0.6.0 from earlier versions. 0.5.x at least starts
the url field with a '?'. This is no longer supported with the
new search code.
Upgraders need to remove the ? from the front of the query url's
otherwise they won't be properly edited.
Also if people have changed the page.html page, they will need
to make sure to put the ? into the code that iterates over
the user's queries otherwise they will get invalid URL's.
-- rouilj
|
msg915 |
Author: [hidden] (richard) |
Date: 2003-08-18 02:11 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=6405
*sigh*, sorry, I missed that bit in the checkins, or I would've had the
change reversed. This is what comes of me not actually *using* the
feature :(
Do you feel it's worthwhile reversing the change, or simply including
instructions regarding how to update the existing queries?
|
msg916 |
Author: [hidden] (jlgijsbers) |
Date: 2003-08-25 14:50 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=469548
Reversing the change would probably not be a good idea. I
made this change (and I apologize for not mentioning it in
upgrade.txt) because with the '?' stuck on the first form
element would also have a '?' stuck in front of it (e.g.
'?:columns' instead of ':columns'). This would make us miss
one of the arguments (usually ':columns').
Anyway, I have fixes ready for upgrading.txt and page.html.
If you don't want to reverse the change, I'll check them in
to both maint-0.6 and HEAD.
|
msg917 |
Author: [hidden] (richard) |
Date: 2003-08-26 00:26 |
|
Logged In: YES
user_id=6405
Go for it.
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2003-08-18 02:01:27 | rouilj | create | |
|