Message1440
Logged In: YES
user_id=6405
Marlon didn't have access to this bugtracker, and wrote:
> The existence of the ".tmp" files means they're not being
deleted
> when transactions are rolled back, or worse they're not being
> renamed when the transaction is committed. What backend
are
> you using?
Were using MySQL. When I reported the bug, both roundup and
MySQL were
running on the same WinNT4 server. By now, we switched over
to a Linux
server for both roundup and MySQL (that is why I needed the
export-import
feature. On Linux I checked the 'db/files/msg' folder and also for
newer
files (created after import) the tmp extension exists. So it's not a
windows
thing.
> If at all possible, could you determine from the timestamp on
> the ".tmp" files when they were created and hence which
version
> of Roundup you were using then?
Altough we used 0.7.6 for a while, we switched back to 0.7.5 for
a few weeks
back (due to some minor query problem we encountered).
Unfortunatly, I can't
tell if both releases created the msg*.tmp files, but I'm 100%
sure that
0.7.5 does. The most resent msg*.tmp has a timestamp of
'2004-10-06 11:34'.
I looked up the message using the web-interface. The time
stamp there is
'2004-10-06.11:34:37', so we could say they are the same. But
what I did see
(when opening the message) it isn't linked to any issue. Also are
all other
msg*.tmp messages not linked to any issue, while all msg* (no
tmp extension)
messages are linked. I asked the author of the latest newest
msg*.tmp
message and he told me that the first submission failed due to
wrongly
filled in data (rejected by auditor). So I tried to do something
with an
issue knowing that the auditor would reject the issue update.
The result was
a new msg*.tmp file that remained there. So it looks like they are
the
result of an auditor reject.
Hope this helps!
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-03 14:20:55 | admin | link | issue1021147 messages |
2009-02-03 14:20:55 | admin | create | |
|