Roundup Tracker - Issues

Message3524

Author stefan
Recipients richard, stefan
Date 2009-02-07.21:00:50
Message-id <498DF67A.4090600@codesourcery.com>
In-reply-to <249b6faa0902071250w5f5bcabeic4f50045f4d32130@mail.gmail.com>
Richard Jones wrote:
> Richard Jones <richard@mechanicalcat.net> added the comment:
> 
> I was referring to how that HTML was available on the Roundup website.
> I have no objection to installing it under /usr/share/doc but not that
> OS X and Windows have no similar facility that I'm aware of.

Oh, then we have been talking past each other a little. :-)

Let me try to summarize how things look from my end:

We have two sets of end-user docs: the website, and the docs that are 
part of the Roundup installation. They overlap considerably, and thus 
are mostly built from the same sources (roundup/doc/).
The generated HTML, however, differs, at least in the navigational 
elements: The website has a menu, while the docs present a 'document 
structure' with 'next'/'previous'/'up' links on each page.

The website wouldn't be installed anywhere other than, well, on the 
website. What I propose to install is the docs (see the attachment of my 
last mail). I'm not sure where docs would end up on Windows / OSX. I'm 
sure we can find precedence in other Python packages that ship 
documentation.

Does this make sense ?

Thanks,
		Stefan
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-07 21:00:51stefansetrecipients: + stefan, richard
2009-02-07 21:00:51stefanlinkissue2550498 messages
2009-02-07 21:00:50stefancreate