Message4742
Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013 16:00:26 schrieb John Rouillard:
> But the auditor *does not*
> call a get on the database. It just uses the info passed to it in the
> db.tx_Source string.
Which I believe should be okay for doing decisions in principle,
there shouldn't be a necessity to explicitely "read" all the values
in order to lock them when basing decisions on them.
> Did I understand you correctly when you indicated that doing a
> cl.get(nodeid, 'tx_Source') in the auditor would cause parallel update
> transactions
Also here, the roundup code itself does the wrong history entry.
> python demo.py -t test ...
Don't forget to use the right backend, if your postgresql
can be accessed by the tests then the demo app can also use it
python demo.py -t -b postgresql nuke |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-09 16:44:57 | ber | set | recipients:
+ ber, schlatterbeck, rouilj, ThomasAH, ezio.melotti |
2013-01-09 16:44:56 | ber | link | issue2550731 messages |
2013-01-09 16:44:56 | ber | create | |
|