Message5440
On 10/01/16 18:17, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Move "scripts: scripts" from setup() to different section.
>
> This will help, because:
>
> 1. entries there are not scripts, but module names (removes hack)
> 2. nobody will try to do anything on them
> 3. custom build_scripts will find its files easily
This would break standard behaviour of distutils. If you have a look at
the distutils build_scripts.copy_scripts() in the standard library[1]
you will see that the scripts kwarg is referenced. If possible I think
we should stick as close as possible to how the standard library does
things while we are using distutils.
As mentioned, there is no urgent need to support 'python setup.py
develop' in the release (it a feature for developers), so I would
suggest just reverting hg4963:cdfb1a3fb56f instead of trying to land
some last minutes changes to setup.py that run the risk of introducing
new bugs just before a release... especially if migrating to setuptools
might end up making any new changes redundant anyway.
[1]
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2.7/Lib/distutils/command/build_scripts.py#L53 |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-01-10 11:58:41 | jerrykan | set | recipients:
+ jerrykan, ber, techtonik, ThomasAH, tonich |
2016-01-10 11:58:41 | jerrykan | link | issue2550898 messages |
2016-01-10 11:58:40 | jerrykan | create | |
|