Roundup Tracker - Issues

Message5616

Author techtonik
Recipients pefu, rouilj, techtonik
Date 2016-06-21.10:40:03
Message-id <CAPkN8xKifJa=5+P0m_gtHP-0hte9p14Q_VEdQQ4qLDxEtDJMJQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1462365431.07.0.197242651487.issue2550907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Peter Funk <issues@roundup-tracker.org> wrote:

>> We can always silence the warnings and comment out tests, but that
>> drops the quality of code (or documentation in this case).
>
> I disagree: We could also remove the ancient documents from the
> source tree.  But including out dated documentation into the index
> just to silence warnings would not improve the quality of the documentation.

There is no conflict here. Documentation is for users, so keeping
outdated stuff is only important for software archaeology, and that
story is pretty well solved by
http://web.archive.org/web/20160327204611/http://www.roundup-tracker.org/docs.html

So I am +1 on cleaning up the stuff.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-21 10:40:05techtoniksetrecipients: + techtonik, rouilj, pefu
2016-06-21 10:40:05techtoniklinkissue2550907 messages
2016-06-21 10:40:04techtonikcreate