Message5739
Hi Bern:
In message
<1467618984.93.0.619589278254.issue2550751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> ,
Bernhard Reiter writes:
>I wonder if there is a limit on header lines in the standards
>(or in practice). If there is not, it may be a defect gateway software
>which we should call out.
AFAIK there is no standards limit to a header length. Each line is
limited to 1000 characters IIRC. But headers can span multiple lines.
Continuation lines are indented with a space under the header line.
This discussion seems to support my thoughts:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2721605/maximum-size-of-email-x-headers
That being said email -> X gateways, exchange ... may have practical
limitations, but I don't know of any off the top of my head.
My claim is the property header should either be disabled or contain
the full info available to be useful.
>How many file attachments are we talking about anyway?
Potentially it could be unlimited.
>What is the purpose of the header?
It looks like the headers were added by:
changeset: 3956:bb2722260e47
user: Richard Jones <richard@users.sourceforge.net>
date: Tue Jan 08 20:55:26 2008 +0000
files: CHANGES.txt doc/index.txt roundup/roundupdb.py
description:
Fixes from Martin v. L?wis:
- Messages created through the web are now given an in-reply-to header
when email out to nosy
- Nosy messages now include more information about issues (all link
properties with a "name" attribute)
google for "Martin Löwis x-roundup" points to:
http://grokbase.com/t/python/tracker-discuss/0817bzj3rw/additional-headers
and that references some issues at:
Title: add keyword info in emails
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue140
User want to see if the patch keyword was added to an issue
so he can filter email.
Title: Tracker emails should list the classification
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue143
User wanted the classification so he could filter emails.
Final comment: This is now fixed in r59861; the tracker
sends X-Roundup-issue-components, as a comma separated
list (omitted if there are no components associated with the issue).
Does this answer your question? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-07-04 14:41:53 | rouilj | set | recipients:
+ rouilj, schlatterbeck, ber, ezio.melotti, ntgarces |
2016-07-04 14:41:53 | rouilj | link | issue2550751 messages |
2016-07-04 14:41:51 | rouilj | create | |
|