Message5759
Hi Peter:
In message
<1467706903.98.0.485533796628.issue2550903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>,
Peter Funk writes:
>
>Thanks for spending your time on this. BTW: is the schema.py of the
>Python bug tracker http://bugs.python.org/ available for reference?
>
>I just made a quick test and the behaviour of http://bugs.python.org/
>has changed since I wrote msg5487 back in march this year:
I have been reading though their meta tracker and I think they said it
was available.
I used google to search for "python.org meta tracker" and the first hit was
https://wiki.python.org/moin/TrackerDocs
which lead to:
https://wiki.python.org/moin/TrackerDevelopment
which references:
http://hg.python.org/tracker/
and we have:
https://hg.python.org/tracker/python-dev/file/tip/schema.py
last updated
Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:53:14 +0300
(so it has changed since you posted) which says:
p = db.security.addPermission(name='Edit', klass='user', check=own_record,
description="User is allowed to edit their own user details",
properties=('username', 'password',
'address', 'realname',
'phone', 'organisation',
'alternate_addresses',
'queries', 'timezone',
'homepage', 'github'))
# Note: 'roles' excluded - users should not be able to edit their own roles.
# Also excluded: contrib_form, contrib_form_date, iscommitter
for r in 'User', 'Developer':
db.security.addPermissionToRole(r, p)
But the last change had nothing to do with those settings. However a
restart to load the new schema may have changed something.
Ralf, if you have to log in there can you update the style.css from
mercurial. I put in a couple of fixes to close out an issue. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-07-05 12:10:57 | rouilj | set | recipients:
+ rouilj, schlatterbeck, ber, thomas_ah, techtonik, pefu |
2016-07-05 12:10:57 | rouilj | link | issue2550903 messages |
2016-07-05 12:10:56 | rouilj | create | |
|