Message836
> [[There appears to be an order dependency with
:required. The
> :required field must come before any of the fields that
satisfy the
> requirement. This is because the "required" list is emptied
as fields
> are processed. The code could be re-worked to use a
post-processing
> phase that would be order independent, but it's probably
easier just
> to document the restriction as I've done above. When the
":required"
> specification is parsed, you could also add code to check
for any
> already-set fields.]]
We can't guarantee that the :required field will appear
before anything else (the order of form variables is
random). Yes, something needs to be done here...
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-03 14:20:22 | admin | link | issue740214 messages |
2009-02-03 14:20:22 | admin | create | |
|