Issue 1163804
Created on 2005-03-15 15:41 by hfoffani, last changed 2021-08-21 19:34 by rouilj.
Messages | |||
---|---|---|---|
msg1898 | Author: [hidden] (hfoffani) | Date: 2005-03-15 15:41 | |
When using the Windows installer, the .BAT files under Scripts directory do not have the correct python path and they also lack CRLF termited lines. |
|||
msg1899 | Author: [hidden] (a1s) | Date: 2005-03-16 06:07 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=8719 python executable path "python" is correct provided that you have python on your search path. it is the best guess for "one size fits all" installer. you may build your own installer by running 'python setup.py bdist_wininst' on your windows system - it will have the paths adjusted for your system. i am not aware of any way to alter the scripts by python installer stub. are you? yes, batch files have unix format newlines because they are built on unix-like system. what's the problem? they run perfectly well on windows, at least on windows nt line. |
|||
msg1900 | Author: [hidden] (hfoffani) | Date: 2005-03-16 10:02 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Oh my... Let's see.... I didn't know the way roundup builds the windows installer nor if it is or it is not possible to run a python script at the end of the process. I reported this (by emailing to the list) because I found that the bat files differs between the installer and 'python setup.py install'. Then, Richard asked me to submit a bug report. As for me, I wouldn't mind to make this a feature request instead. Is at least possible to open a message box (or a readme) at the end of the install process and tell the user she might has to customize the scripts? |
|||
msg1901 | Author: [hidden] (a1s) | Date: 2005-03-16 10:10 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=8719 i'm affraid not. but i am not sure, on the level. on the other hand, newline issue is fixable if it is really needed. |
|||
msg1902 | Author: [hidden] (tobias-herp) | Date: 2006-03-04 02:07 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=805804 sys.executable could be used; it points to the installed python.exe. This would make the .bat files work. In a standard Python installation on Windows, the PATH is not set to contain the directory containing it; it doesn't need to, since the interpreter will be called when the name of a Python file is entered. It would be more useful to put the ...\Python\Scripts directory in the path, I think. If '.py' is contained in the PATHEXT environment variable, even the extension .py can be omitted. I don't think the newlines are an issue; all editors I use work perfectly well with *IX or DOS files (at least when the linebreaks are consistent). |
|||
msg1903 | Author: [hidden] (a1s) | Date: 2006-03-04 09:05 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=8719 i do not understand how sys.executable can be used in binary windows installer to adjust the path in scripts. |
|||
msg1904 | Author: [hidden] (tobias-herp) | Date: 2006-03-13 10:58 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=805804 Well, I don't know much about how the binary installer works, but... 1st: shouldn't it be possible to involke a Python script which in turn would be able to use sys.executable? Python must be installed anyway. 2nd possibility (probably the best; works for me): in the .bat files, rely on the Windows feature which automatically calls the interpreter for .py files, and possibly use 'if errorlevel ...' to display an error message with instructions for the user to insert the full path to the interpreter himself. 3rd possibility: omit the .bat files, and instruct users to add .py to the PATHEXT environment variable (which might be difficult for those who don't have administration rights on their machine), or let the installer apply this change 4th possibility: a binary installer should be able to query the registry for the location of the interpreter. I just seeked for python.exe myself and found: [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Applications\python.exe\shell\open\command] @="\"C:\\Programme\\Python\\Python24\\python.exe\" \"%1\" %*" [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Python.CompiledFile\shell\open\command] @="\"C:\\Programme\\Python\\Python24\\python.exe\" \"%1\" %*" [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Python.File\shell\open\command] @="\"C:\\Programme\\Python\\Python24\\python.exe\" \"%1\" %*" [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FileExts\.py\OpenWithList] "a"="python.exe" "MRUList"="cba" "b"="gvim.exe" [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\ShellNoRoam\MUICache] "C:\\Programme\\Python\\Python24\\python.exe"="python" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\Applications\python.exe\shell\open\command] @="\"C:\\Programme\\Python\\Python24\\python.exe\" \"%1\" %*" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\Python.exe] @="C:\\Programme\\Python\\Python24\\Python.exe" (...) The last two might be the most useful, but I'm not sure whether they'd be present e.g. in an ActiveState installation as well. |
|||
msg1905 | Author: [hidden] (tobias-herp) | Date: 2006-08-12 00:58 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=805804 We're talking about Windows... Like I stated before, the Python interpreter is normally NOT found along the PATH there. The Python installer simply doesn't do this! (most programs are never called from the command line) On my system (standard python 2.4.2 from python.org) I can call the interpreter through the PATH only because I created a python.bat in my tools directory, calling "C:\Programme\Python\Python24\python.exe %*". The PATH entry isn't normally needed for scripting languages on Windows; same for the Rexx interpreter which is still present on my desktop computer. Windows recognises the extension and calls the appropriate program. Trying to call the interpreter explicitly DOESN'T WORK. The newlines should be fixed for the Windows installer distribution; I'm sure there is a program which can do the work. I noticed that notepad.exe still doesn't like Unix line endings; and an Issue tracker which claims to be easy to use should take care to not scare off unexperienced users. I couldn't find .bat nor .cmd files in the CVS tree; otherwise I would have provided a patch. |
|||
msg5520 | Author: [hidden] (rouilj) | Date: 2016-04-11 00:25 | |
Do we still provide a windows installable version of roundup? |
|||
msg5888 | Author: [hidden] (rouilj) | Date: 2016-07-31 20:27 | |
Answer to my own quession is yes we do. It is created on a unix system using: python setup.py bdist_wininst --user-access-control force as part of the release process documented in RELEASE.txt. According ti: https://docs.python.org/2.7/distutils/builtdist.html#the-postinstallation-script there is the possibility to add a postinstall script. So at the very least it can print to stdout what the user may need to do to get the windows distribution working. However I am not able to do the work required since I no longer have reliable access to a modern windows box. Alternatively we just don't distribute the binary windows version anymore. Suggestions before I close this out as postponed? |
|||
msg7327 | Author: [hidden] (rouilj) | Date: 2021-08-21 19:34 | |
The ability to create a window binary distribution is deprecated. So this ticket is out of date. bdist_wininst is deprecated since Python 3.8. https://docs.python.org/3/distutils/builtdist.html closing. |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2021-08-21 19:34:56 | rouilj | set | status: open -> closed resolution: out of date messages: + msg7327 |
2016-07-31 20:27:17 | rouilj | set | keywords:
+ Effort-Medium messages: + msg5888 |
2016-04-11 00:25:47 | rouilj | set | nosy:
+ tobias-herp, rouilj, - tobias-herp messages: + msg5520 |
2005-03-15 15:41:29 | hfoffani | create |