Roundup Tracker - Issues

Message3511

Author stefan
Recipients richard, stefan, tonimueller
Date 2009-02-05.18:34:39
Message-id <498B3135.5090802@codesourcery.com>
In-reply-to <20090205181704.4188.qmail@oak.oeko.net>
Toni Mueller wrote:

> I'd like to note that most of my bug reports are not my own creation,
> but things that hit my mailbox in the course of maintaining Debian's
> roundup package. So, if you want to thank someone for originally
> finding, and/or solving, the problem, you usually need to go to the
> Debian bug reports that I link to.

I see. May I suggest we introduce a convention that allows a) the 
tracker to generate appropriate links into the upstream tracker and b) 
makes casual readers immediately aware of where the link goes ?
May be a syntax such as 'debian#514215' in this case ?

>> wonder whether it wouldn't be better to actually install the docs as
>> part of the roundup package, and then, fixing these links to point to
>> local documentation instead of the Roundup website.
> 
> I don't currently augment the package with docs that are not contained
> in the package. So, only the contained man pages get shipped with the
> package. Although I also see value in having local docs, linking to the
> project's web page is a good idea, imho, at least now that the project
> has a wiki, too.

OK. Yes, I was thinking of packaging docs that right now are generated 
but not installed / packaged.

Thanks,
          Stefan
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-05 18:34:39stefansetrecipients: + stefan, richard, tonimueller
2009-02-05 18:34:39stefanlinkissue2550496 messages
2009-02-05 18:34:39stefancreate