On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> OK. I agree it makes sense not to break compatibility without a good
> reason. I'm not sure though what exactly needs to be done, as I don't
> know under what name(s) / URLs documentation has been referred to.
> Toni's example was http://roundup.sourceforge.net/doc-1.0/, which could
> be solved either by a local link, or an URL rewrite.

This seems reasonable.

> What other URLs need to be kept alive ?

None, though we lost the "user feedback" page along the way, which is a shame.