Issue 2551106
Created on 2020-12-05 17:55 by mbehrle, last changed 2021-04-12 18:00 by rouilj.
msg7039 |
Author: [hidden] (mbehrle) |
Date: 2020-12-05 17:55 |
|
Since migrating to roundup2 incoming mail messages generally were rendered with additional line breaks, i.e. each line break was doubled. This was with default setting leave_body_unchanged = no.
Using setting leave_body_unchanged = yes doesn't show this behaviour.
I think it is due to line 1919 in mailgw.py, with
content = '\n\n'.join(l)
I don't know if there was a specific reason to add two line breaks or if it was by accident, please have a look at the patch attached.
|
msg7040 |
Author: [hidden] (schlatterbeck) |
Date: 2020-12-05 18:17 |
|
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 05:55:06PM +0000, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> Since migrating to roundup2 incoming mail messages generally were
> rendered with additional line breaks, i.e. each line break was
> doubled. This was with default setting leave_body_unchanged = no.
>
> Using setting leave_body_unchanged = yes doesn't show this behaviour.
>
> I think it is due to line 1919 in mailgw.py, with
>
> content = '\n\n'.join(l)
Thanks Mathias for the bug-report
Hmm, I'm always using 'leave_body_unchanged = yes' in all my setups.
Can anyone comment who uses leave_body_unchanged = no?
Note that this code is *old* (commit 2002 according to hg blame).
Ralf
--
Dr. Ralf Schlatterbeck Tel: +43/2243/26465-16
Open Source Consulting www: www.runtux.com
Reichergasse 131, A-3411 Weidling email: office@runtux.com
|
msg7041 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2020-12-20 05:52 |
|
Hi Mathias:
I can't manage to reproduce your problem. It looks like the regression
tests do test this code path and your patch breaks all these tests.
The \n\n is correct as 'l' is a set of message sections separated by
blank lines, so \n\n terminates the last line in the previous section
and adds a blank line.
What are the settings for these options in the mailgw section of your
config.ini:
keep_quoted_text
leave_body_unchanged
eol_re
blankline_re
sign_re
Thanks.
-- rouilj
|
msg7042 |
Author: [hidden] (mbehrle) |
Date: 2020-12-20 11:46 |
|
Hi John,
> I can't manage to reproduce your problem. It looks like the regression
> tests do test this code path and your patch breaks all these tests.
>
> The \n\n is correct as 'l' is a set of message sections separated by
> blank lines, so \n\n terminates the last line in the previous section
> and adds a blank line.
Ok, than this should not be the reason.
>
> What are the settings for these options in the mailgw section of your
> config.ini:
>
> keep_quoted_text
> leave_body_unchanged
> eol_re
> blankline_re
> sign_re
Settings of the mailgw section:
[mailgw]
keep_quoted_text = yes
leave_body_unchanged = yes/no -> this one makes the difference
default_class = issue
language =
subject_prefix_parsing = strict
subject_suffix_parsing = strict
subject_suffix_delimiters = []
subject_content_match = always
subject_updates_title = no
refwd_re = (\s*\W?\s*(fw|fwd|re|aw|sv|ang)\W)+
origmsg_re = ^[>|\s]*-----\s?Original Message\s?-----$
sign_re = ^[>|\s]*-- ?$
eol_re = [\r\n]+
blankline_re = [\r\n]+\s*[\r\n]+
unpack_rfc822 = no
ignore_alternatives = no
convert_htmltotext = none
keep_real_from = no
Thank you for looking into this!
|
msg7045 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2021-01-03 18:06 |
|
Hi Mathias,
I am having no luck seeing this bug.
Do you have or can you generate an email that I can test with
that will cause the failure.
I have been testing in the current head release, but you can test
with an unpacked distribution tarball without your patch applied (pip download
-d . roundup). Or you can get the current tip from https://sourceforge.net/p/roundup/code/ci/default/tarball?path=.
Untar/unzip and in the top level directory:
Run python3 demo.py with any backend database (sqlite is probably
best as I assume you are running an rdbms in production).
This will set up the demo test directory. Then you should be able to test
with:
python3 roundup/scripts/roundup_mailgw.py demo mailbox tracker.test.mbox
where tracker.test.mbox is an mbox formatted file with one message in it. You
can create an mbox formatted file by saving a raw email
to the file then edit it and add:
From user@domain Mon Sep 09 01:56:35 2020
at the top of the file where user@domain matches the email address
in the From: email header. I recommend using the mailbox as it allows
using the debugger by adding '-m pdb'.
I could see one of the following differences causing my failure to
reproduce:
python version: can you supply the version (pythonX -V) that you
are using for roundup?
locale settings: Are you using a German locale?
I have applied other patches where I have been unable to reproduce
the issue, but they didn't break the regression tests. So I won't
apply your patch, but I would like to find out what is going wrong
for you.
Have a great 2021.
-- rouilj
|
msg7099 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2021-03-12 22:45 |
|
Hi Mathias:
I still need to be able to reproduce this issue.
Do you have a sample email that exhibits this problem?
-- rouilj
|
msg7102 |
Author: [hidden] (mbehrle) |
Date: 2021-03-13 09:33 |
|
Hi John,
thanks again for looking into the issue.
> I still need to be able to reproduce this issue.
> Do you have a sample email that exhibits this problem?
I now made some further tests and I confirm that the proposed patch has nothing
to do with the problem.
I am joining several mails to show the results that depend only the different
setting of leave_body_unchanged.
root@roundup:~# locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=
My roundup instance
- is almost trunk
- is running in an LXC container
- in a virtualenv
- on Debian buster
(roundup) venv@roundup:~/projects/roundup$ python
Python 3.7.3 (default, Jul 25 2020, 13:03:44)
[GCC 8.3.0] on linux
--
Mathias Behrle
MBSolutions
Gilgenmatten 10 A
D-79114 Freiburg
Tel: +49(761)471023
Fax: +49(761)4770816
http://www.m9s.biz
UStIdNr: DE 142009020
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
|
msg7112 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2021-03-15 02:28 |
|
Hi Mathias:
I took a quick look.
One thing I noticed is that you have pgp signatures on the emails.
Do you have pgp enabled? if so what is required_incoming set to?
We change the PGP processing library from pyme to gpg. I wonder if
the extra lines are coming from there.
-- rouilj
|
msg7113 |
Author: [hidden] (mbehrle) |
Date: 2021-03-15 08:12 |
|
* John Rouillard: " [issue2551106] Additional line breaks with setting
leave_body_unchanged = no" (Mon, 15 Mar 2021 02:28:59 +0000):
Hi John,
> I took a quick look.
>
> One thing I noticed is that you have pgp signatures on the emails.
That was also one of my thoughts.
> Do you have pgp enabled? if so what is required_incoming set to?
No pgp enabled.
require_incoming = signed
> We change the PGP processing library from pyme to gpg. I wonder if
> the extra lines are coming from there.
Cheers
--
Mathias Behrle
MBSolutions
Gilgenmatten 10 A
D-79114 Freiburg
Tel: +49(761)471023
Fax: +49(761)4770816
http://www.m9s.biz
UStIdNr: DE 142009020
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
|
msg7147 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2021-03-28 18:43 |
|
Hi Mathias:
It looks like your result file is a email nosy message.
Please view the message file in the roundup tracker home directory
under the db/files/msg/<prefix>/msg<msgid>.
Prefix the the first or first two digits of the message id.
Does the extra line spacing show up there as well?
I submitted file1746 to my running test tracker (modified with email
address of a tracker user and a different subject issue#) at:
https://rouilj dot dynamic-dns.net slash sysadmin/issue1
(url mangled to prevent it from being hit by bots/indexers).
I didn't get any extra whitespace in the msg file, nosy email or web
interface. (If you view the url above, it uses a line height that adds
whitespace between lines. Try highlighting lines to verify that there
are no additional blank line.)
The mailgw settings are:
[mailgw]
keep_quoted_text = yes
leave_body_unchanged = no
default_class = issue
language =
subject_prefix_parsing = strict
subject_suffix_parsing = strict
subject_suffix_delimiters = []
subject_content_match = always
subject_updates_title = no
refwd_re = (\s*\W?\s*(fw|fwd|re|aw|sv|ang)\W)+
origmsg_re = ^[>|\s]*-----\s?Original Message\s?-----$
sign_re = ^[>|\s]*-- ?$
eol_re = [\r\n]+
blankline_re = [\r\n]+\s*[\r\n]+
unpack_rfc822 = no
ignore_alternatives = no
convert_htmltotext = none
keep_real_from = no
that looks exactly like yours.
If I get a chance later today I'll spin up and configure a demo
tracker and see if I can reproduce with that. However my tracker
doesn't do anything special with message formatting so ...
I wonder if it has something to do with system locale or some such.
All my boxes are configured with en_US. Ralf, do you have a test
tracker using DE that you could test file1746 with
leave_body_unchanged=no.
|
msg7166 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2021-04-05 15:57 |
|
Ping Mathias:
Did you verify the extra newlines are in the stored message file?
Any other thoughts on my last update?
Have a great day.
-- rouilj
|
msg7168 |
Author: [hidden] (mbehrle) |
Date: 2021-04-05 19:27 |
|
* John Rouillard: " [issue2551106] Additional line breaks with setting
leave_body_unchanged = no" (Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:57:51 +0000):
Hi John,
> Did you verify the extra newlines are in the stored message file?
Yes, the additional line breaks are in the db files, it is not a font problem
of the MUA or similar. I am joining the relevant db files as tar.gz.
> Any other thoughts on my last update?
Not really.
Since I seem to be the only one hitting that problem probability is
high that the issue is related to my local installation. Since I am well served
with my current (and anyway preferred) settings I think it is adequate to
postpone this issue and to not invest too much energy from your side on it until
someone else hits the problem or I can give more input. Big thanks goes to you
for the effort already done!
> Have a great day.
To you as well!
Mathias
|
msg7189 |
Author: [hidden] (rouilj) |
Date: 2021-04-12 18:00 |
|
Hi Mathias:
I will close this ticket out as unfixed.
Hope you enjoy using roundup.
-- rouilj
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-04-12 18:00:55 | rouilj | set | status: open -> closed resolution: later messages:
+ msg7189 |
2021-04-05 19:27:32 | mbehrle | set | files:
+ db_files.tar.gz messages:
+ msg7168 |
2021-04-05 15:57:51 | rouilj | set | messages:
+ msg7166 |
2021-03-28 18:43:57 | rouilj | set | priority: normal messages:
+ msg7147 |
2021-03-15 08:12:36 | mbehrle | set | messages:
+ msg7113 |
2021-03-15 02:28:59 | rouilj | set | messages:
+ msg7112 |
2021-03-13 09:33:22 | mbehrle | set | files:
+ issue2551106_test_additional_line_breaks_leave_body_unchanged_yes_result.txt, issue2551106_test_additional_line_breaks_leave_body_unchanged_yes_sent.txt, issue2551106_test_additional_line_breaks_leave_body_unchanged_no_result.txt, issue2551106_test_additional_line_breaks_leave_body_unchanged_no_sent.txt messages:
+ msg7102 |
2021-03-12 22:45:31 | rouilj | set | messages:
+ msg7099 |
2021-01-03 18:06:47 | rouilj | set | messages:
+ msg7045 |
2020-12-20 11:46:07 | mbehrle | set | messages:
+ msg7042 |
2020-12-20 05:52:17 | rouilj | set | status: new -> open assignee: rouilj messages:
+ msg7041 nosy:
+ rouilj |
2020-12-05 18:17:53 | schlatterbeck | set | nosy:
+ schlatterbeck messages:
+ msg7040 |
2020-12-05 17:55:06 | mbehrle | create | |
|